Deshone Kizer career stats outline the journey of a quarterback who moved from college prominence in South Bend to multiple stops in professional football. This overview establishes the context for deeper performance metrics and positional impact.
Tracking Deshone Kizer career stats reveals trends in efficiency, durability, and decision-making across teams and competition levels. The following breakdown translates raw numbers into meaningful insights for analysts and fans.
| Season | Team | GP | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | NY Jets | 7 | 49 | 109 | 488 | 2 | 4 | 79.7 |
| 2019 | Cleveland Browns | 12 | 103 | 182 | 1,213 | 6 | 5 | 88.4 |
| 2020 | Green Bay Packers | 3 | 8 | 13 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 95.2 |
| 2021 | Houston Gamblers | 10 | 189 | 310 | USFL2,385 | 13 | 9 | 95.6 |
| 2022 | Michigan Panthers | 6 | 63 | 117 | 786 | 5 | 3 | 102.0 |
College Roots and Draft Profile
Deshone Kizer college performance at Notre Dame shaped his early draft narrative, showcasing arm talent and mobility within a high-major program. Scouts weighed his collegiate production against positional expectations and durability concerns.
His draft stock reflected both upside and risk, influencing how teams later framed his professional career. Understanding this phase helps contextualize the subsequent professional chapters in Deshone Kizer career stats.
Professional Passing Efficiency
Completion Metrics and Yardage
Across league stops, Deshone Kizer career stats show varied completion percentages and yards per attempt, mirroring scheme fit and competition depth. Higher efficiency in the USFL aligns with tailored roles and fewer pressures in certain games.
Touchdown and Interception Balance
Touchdown totals fluctuate with offensive support, while interception counts highlight turnover risk at different stages of his career. Examining TD-Int ratios offers a clearer view of red-zone and decision-making reliability.
Team Transitions and Opportunities
Movement between the Jets, Browns, Packers, and USFL teams illustrates a career shaped by opportunity and reinvention. Each organization presented different expectations, offensive structures, and competition levels.
These transitions affected stability and workload, which in turn influenced seasonal stats and long-term development as a professional passer.
Physical Profile and Playing Style
Size, arm strength, and mobility define Deshone Kizer playing style, affecting how defenses approach him in and out of the pocket. His ability to extend plays with his legs adds dimension but also factors into durability questions reflected in career stats.
Coaching schemes that leverage his strengths while mitigating liabilities can be seen in the variation of his performance metrics from year to year.
Key Takeaways for Analysts and Fans
- Efficiency improved in tailored USFL schemes compared with early NFL appearances.
- Durability and workload variability influenced seasonal consistency across teams.
- Touchdown decisions and ball security fluctuated with competition level and offensive support.
- Physical traits enabled play extension but also contributed to injury risk over a long season.
- Scheme fit and coaching emphasis played a larger role in career trajectory than raw athletic tools alone.
FAQ
Reader questions
Which season represents the peak of Deshone Kizer career stats?
His 2022 season with the Michigan Panthers stands out with the highest passer rating of 102.0 and strong touchdown production relative to attempts.
How did team changes affect his completion percentage?
Moving to offenses tailored to his skill set, especially in the USFL, correlated with higher completion rates and improved yards per attempt compared with earlier NFL stints.
What does his touchdown-to-interception ratio reveal?
Ratios improve in leagues with better offensive support and scheme fit, while more volatile ratios in brief NFL tenures reflect situational pressure and decision-making challenges.
How do his college stats compare to his professional numbers?
College production at Notre Dame featured higher volume and variability, while professional stats show more modest but steadier outputs in limited opportunities.